Since I’ve been
getting a little behind with the journal, it’s hard for me to remember what we
did the first three or four classes; so, I’d like to think about what I’m going
to write as some kind of overview of what we’ve done up to now. After this
entry I guess I can compromise with myself and start writing on a “daily
basis”(no guarantee, though).
Let’s see, if I
understood correctly (if I’ve been a good observer), for the past 3-4 weeks
we’ve been covering topics that are essential for society to maintain good
expression and communication in between all kinds of people. By saying this,
I’m talking about Writing, Language, Rhetoric, etc. And all these topics have
been covered up with two particular tools: discussion and perspective. We’ve
been using a graph (the f*ck#ng graph! like Zach said) to map out certain
problems along with their appropriate/logical solutions, and we’ve been
analyzing how sometimes we involve unintentionally with them. This has been
very interesting, because even though some times we address topics like “being
a believer” (which at times like these it is very hard to discuss in such way
that does not offend or sound disrespectful to others) the graph always seems
to “balance” everything. Thus we all end up agreeing with one side or another
without having to get stubborn and argue about which side is better or “perfectly”
correct. At the end it is human behavior and the best thing we can do is to be
tolerant.
Also, after two
or three classes we started analyzing, in a rhetorical way, texts and
especially various pieces of advertising. This was something new for me. Yes,
we all are aware that most of the advertisements and television commercials are
intended to persuade you so that you can buy products, so that you can become a
consumer; but here in class we’ve been doing it more thoroughly. Every little
piece that constitutes the ad/article is separated and analyzed individually,
allowing us to understand and criticize its pros and cons. How useful, right?
This is actually
one of our major assignments: pick a text/essay/article and rhetorically
analyze it. Let’s see if Gallop’s “Close Reading” article helps out here. Since
I still haven’t found what I’m going to analyze, I better leave this blog and
keep looking around.